Two really daft ideas

Recently the powers that are have initiated moves that are, IMHO, daft at the minimum.

I refer first to the revelation that the Ministry of Environment is toying with the idea to get volunteers to book litter bugs.

While this is still a twinkle in the MOE’s eye, I hope it won’t be made flesh.

First, those who take on the volunteer job with “gusto” are likely to be those who, having nowhere else to throw their weight, will see this as a heaven sent opportunity to tell someone off. Hardly the best motive for being a rubbishy volunteer!

Second, those who take on the task out of truly good heartedness and love of a clean environment are likely to be no match for the hard core litter bug. And could end up being beaten up.

So from a rubbish problem, we could trigger needless and pointless crimes and keep our law enforcers more busy than ever 😥

The Ministry of Environment may do better to start a scheme to encourage the growth of volunteer beach and other public precinct combers.

Like offering incentives! Bring in XX kilos of rubbish per week from designated locations over one year and you will stand to get one/two/three extra chances of ballotting for school/HDB/whatever. Perhaps throw in a free Cat E COE.

This could grow into one big national bonding exercise. Friends and family members may even rally round to help the person who needs the extra “go-s” at balloting or the free Cat E COE.

This way, Singapore will stand a better chance of remaining litter free in public places than creating an army of volunteer enforcers or enhancing corrective work order punishments.

I turn now to the other daft idea of 2012.

Instead of just food vouchers, the North-East Community Development Council (CDC) will give needy residents vouchers, which they can use to pay for haircuts, fresh fruit from markets or even a mobile phone.

The reason is to give beneficiaries more choices in using the vouchers and also benefit mom-and-pop shops in the heartland that participate in the scheme. These community vouchers, as they are called, will come in denominations of $2, $5 and $10.

I think it’s really daft to expand the use of such vouchers beyond food. Yes to fresh fruit because that would surely come under the “food” label, but no to haircuts and mobile phones!

If the recipients are so strapped that they need vouchers funded by the community, then the vouchers must be spent on food, not frittered on non-essentials like haircuts and mobiles! Especially haircuts!

If even a celebrity like Jennie Chua (I think it’s Jennie Chua) can say in an interview that she cuts her own hair, I don’t see why folks on community vouchers must use them to get a hair cut!

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Two really daft ideas

  1. Pingback: Daily SG: 25 Sep 2012 | The Singapore Daily

  2. Haircuts is essential la, you need to look neat and tidy in order to be able to get a job so you can get out of the poverty cycle. Mobile phones on the other hand might be less essential although admittedly it is pretty difficult to find a public phone nowadays.

  3. Uncle G: well, they even beat up traffic wardens; so you can expect volunteers on the rubbish trail to get similar treatment.

    Uncle Qzact: No money for an interview haircut? No public phone so must have mobile? I think we are proposing sending the Titanic when all is needed is a sampan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s