Sale: saddest 4-letter word in SG

Today is the start of the Great Singapore Sale! The 20th year and for all of two months some more: from May 31 to July 28!

As if that’s not enough, there’s the online flash sale unaffiliated to the GSS – the “Bigger Better Sale” – now on at www.biggerbettersale.com

Frankly, I don’t know why any retailer bothers to join any national sale campaign even if its billed as prestigious, considering that anyone who ventures out of his home can always find several sales on at any time of the year.

Go to any mall, national or neighbourhood and there’s bound to be one or a combination of these sales going on:

Anniversary sale; opening sale; closing down sale; clearance sale; moving out sale; re-location sale; special sale; renovation sale; half-price sale; everything must go sale etc..

Then there are the sales associated with festive occasions: pre-Chinese New Year/Christmas/Hari Raya/Holiday/National Day sale; post-Chinese New Year/Christmas/Hari Raya/Holiday/National Day sale;  etc

You name it, there’s a sale to mark the occasion or a reason. Why, there’s even a website dedicated to tracking the perennial sales in town at
http://www.heregotsale.com/

The only difference between shops selling the same stuff that’s on sale appears to be the size of their discount.

Some say “up to 70% off”; others up the ante with “up to 90% off”. Yet others say “50% off for the 2nd item”; or 30% off for X,Y or Z item. The idea is to give the shopper the impression he is getting a discount off the regular price, whatever that might be.

Do shops mark up the prices be4 they bring them down? Is the discount based on the intrinsic value of an item?

I always wonder why shop-keepers employ such tactics or strategies, especially jewellery shops.

What does it say of the diamonds and other gems they sell if they can knock off as much as 90% to bring the customer through the door?

In fact, I find the sales that go on all year round demean that shops and the brands they sell.

Twenty years ago the Great Singapore Sale might indeed be the sale worth waiting for.

Not any more. Who wants to wait when there’s a sale yesterday, today, tomorrow, ad infinitum.

Perhaps it’s time for GSS to do a Singa? And bow out!

 

Curious case of intern who got whacked

I refer to the 29-year-old “intern” who got whacked on his head by his supervisor besides being verbally abused with vulgarities.

The company where he worked has been identified as Encore eServices and the supervisor as Alan Lee.

OK, I didn’t see the 17-second video clip that went viral via YouTube but I take it that it can’t all be made up.

Not when it’s been reported in the Straits Times and other newspapers as well as being shown on TV.

And everyone and his uncle who are in HR or trade unions — or even if they aren’t in either but are just normal human beings — have waxed indignation, even anger, against the supervisor.

I however don’t quite know what to make of this.

First, I find it incredible that there is a man in his prime who won’t retaliate when a supervisor slaps him on the head while scolding him. In jest perhaps but not when it’s for real. :roll:

Why didn’t the intern move away, protest and yes, retaliate? Whatever happened to his brain? Or sense of self-preservation?

Second, why is a graduate of 29 interning for as long as three years, earning as little as $500 per month and working for as long as 12 hours per day? Besides getting scolded regularly?

The pay and hours of work aren’t even reasonable for toilet or food court cleaners who being old, poor and uneducated may not have other options.

But surely not a graduate in his prime? Unless he is a martyr or a masochist or there is something particularly rewarding that made him attached to his work place?

Third, his parents stepping forward to demand $100K in compensation.

I gasp.

The intern isn’t 9 but 29. He is a graduate. Shouldn’t he be the one to initiate the move to seek compensation, not his ma and pa?

After all, I thought parents no longer need to represent their children once they come of age, unless the child is in some ways incapable.

Like I said, there’s something in this intern-whacked-by-boss story that doesn’t quite add up. I don’t know what it is but I wish the media who went to town with it had had at least sought some answers to these questions :roll:

American reality

So the Todds, the parents of Dr Shane Todd who died nearly a year ago in a conservation house near Chinatown, have flounced off in a huff from our courts, threatening to take their allegations against Singapore, our police, China, Huawei and goodness knows what and who else to the “court of public opinion”.

Should anyone be at all surprised by these developments?

No one should be if we only reflect on what the typical behaviour of the United States has been — and still is – when dealing with foreign counterparts.

If the US says your country is a rogue state, your government is a dictatorship and whatever weapons you have for legitimate self-defence are really weapons of mass destruction (WMD), what chances do you have of gainsaying any of her allegations, unsubstantiated — and probably mad– though all of them might be?

Probably nil. And before long, what may be conjectures or just something that came out of smoking too much grass becomes facts in the court of public opinion.

With devastating consequences as shown by those countries so fingered by the US continue — they continue to bleed and bleed years, if not decades, afterwards, a fact that continues to hog media headlines day in and out, 24/7.

So we shouldn’t blame the Todds for choosing to play this card. It’s after all in their cultural and political DNA.

I also wholly empathise with the sort of reality that has enveloped them since their beloved son died in such horribly unnatural circumstances, far away from home and all alone.

Any death is a death too many for those left behind.

I empathise because for some insane 30 minutes or so, I went into a parallel universe much like the Todds when my father passed away quite suddenly nearly 12 years ago.

Oh sure, he was pushing 90. He had several small age-related illnesses but nothing enough to send him into eternity.

Hence there was no anticipation or mental preparation.

Hence one night when one of my brothers rushed him to hospital for an apparent, sudden and unexpected collapse and me and his other children and other family members followed there immediately, the worst didn’t feature in anyone’s mind. At least not mine!.

This was especially when the hospital managed to revive dad and warded him in ICU, giving hope — entirely misplaced as it turned out — that it was a temporary health hiccup.

Imagine my stunned disbelief when the sibling who volunteered to remain in the hospital called as we were preparing to eat early lunch to say that father “has gone”.

“Gone where?” I asked. Stupidly.

The whole extended family descended on the hospital again and took our turn –singly or in small groups — to sit with dad’s body in a room the hospital had thoughfully set aside for such situations.

When my turn came, I stared at my shrouded father and thought I saw s small twitch in the white cloth that he was wrapped in. I looked harder. There, the twitch again. Was it the overhead aircon? No! No downward or sideways breeze.

My hopes soared. There must have been a mistake. I threw open the door.

“Call the nurse! No, call the doctor!” I called out loudly to surprised family members outside.

A nurse came running. When I blurted out my observation to her, she said she would get the doctor. A matronly woman soon arrived. Introduced herself as the head nurse (matron?). The doctor in charge of your dad’s case had already gone off duty and she would help me instead.

She listened to my by then many times recounted observation. The shroud moved. There must have been a mistake. Dad was Ok??

She was soft spoken and soothing. She didn’t contradict me; didn’t pooh pooh what I said.

“Let’s check,” she said.

She gently unwrapped the top part of the shroud. Dad looked stiff and cold. I stared. I didn’t dare touch the body to confirm.

“I’ll come back later,” she said, ever so gently and left — sort of glided out of the room.

Meanwhile, those family members who joined us in the room looked embarrassed. Still, no one said anything to contradict or comfort me.

I pondered. I didn’t know what to think but decided that I was most probably mistaken. Years later, I’m convinced that I was mistaken.

Grief can do strange things to the mind. Especially grief that comes like an unpredicted tsunami.

I got out of my temporary insanity almost as soon as I fell into it. I could. I’m Singaporean.

Can the Todds? It could be more difficult in their environment where individuals are ingrained to think that freedom means the right to believe whatever they want, even when it’s patently a reality that no sane person shares! :cry:

 

Elective mastectomy

Years and years ago, I went to SGH to visit a dear friend who was going through tough times in her professional and personal life.

I wondered why she had to add one more burden to her already much burdened life.

She had an elective double-mastectomy. Her surgeon was the famous plastic surgeon Dr Martin Huang who was still in public service at that time — which underlines just how long ago it was.

I didn’t and still don’t know why my friend opted for that operation. She didn’t have any illness — immediate or potential — that I was aware of that made the drastic step mandatory.

My friend is still hale and hearty today, although being accident prone she’s had a broken elbow and ankle in the intervening years.

Hearing and reading the much repeated news of Angelina Jolie’s elective double mastectomy today brought back that episode that had sunk into the back roads of my mind!

In the past, women cut off their long hair when they wanted to move on in life. In the present, many still do opt for this.

But maybe radical surgery could become the new normal for a small minority? :cry:

 

 

 

Reality blind

There’s no such thing as race blindness

There’s no such thing as wealth blindness

There’s no such thing as hierarchy blindness

There’s no such thing as benefit blindness

There’s no such thing as status blindness

There’s no such thing as gender blindness

There’s no such thing as age blindness

There’s no such thing as qualification blindness

Anyone who claims otherwise

Suffers from a terrible impediment!

R-e-a-l-I-t-y b-l-I-n-d-n-e-s-s

So, so hypocritical!

Today, I was forced to buy 3 Ikea blue “re-usable” bags for a total cost of $1.50. One medium sized bag for 90 cents to carry some $20 worth of mostly plastic products that I found super cheap. Another 60 cents were spent on two smaller bags to carry food that I also found were super cheap.

For the $20 spent in the store, I got a large dish drainer and tray, a set of 17 plastic re-usable boxes, two pot holders and a glass vase.  Gr8 buys for the money right?

Ditto the food from the Ikea cafeteria and delicatessen. A large pack of smoked salmon for $12.50! Three jars of pickled herrings for $5.80. Two bars of dark chocolate for under $5!

In addition, I bought cooked food that would feed three at dinner! Six of Ikea’s famous deep fried chicken wings plus BBQ baby back ribs and a large bag of French fries. Very good value for about $18.

As the cold food couldn’t mix with the piping hot food, I opted to splash 60 cents on two small Ikea bags.

I have no quarrels with these gr8 value for money purchases.

But I have huge quarrels with the store’s sheer hypocrisy in claiming to help save the environment first with its “no free disposable plastic bags” policy that started some 6 years ago and second, since last month only “re-usable” plastic bags are available — at a price to the customer, of course.

As a result, I spent $1.50 on three bags that I might or might not re-use. Chances are they will be discarded as I’m not in a hurry to return to Ikea where I will bring the bags, if I remember. Perhaps in another 6 month? Since today I already bought all I wanted to buy.

Unlike plastic disposable bags, Ikea’s blue bags are no good as bin liners or for wrapping wet trash be4 sending it down the rubbish.

So major fail Ikea if you truly believe you are saving the environment with your bag policy.

But what takes the cake in Ikea’s high-handed action to deprive customers the choice of plastic bags in the name of being environmentally friendly is that the policy is coupled with one that offers the shopper 3 hours’ of free parking for just $5 spent!

Thus I was pleasantly surprised that at the car park exit the $8+ worth of parking charge was wholly and completely offset by the complimentary pass given me after I made my purchases.

Of course I drive a tiny-tiny car and I live not too far away from Ikea. So the carbon foot print of my being encouraged to drive to shop at Ikea may not be gigantic.

But not all shoppers at Ikea are like me. So what little environmental pollution that’s been saved by its bag policy may be partly or even wholly offset by its customers’ cars!

Leading to at best a greenie gesture that doesn’t deliver :roll: And leaving me with three useless blue bags :cry:

 

Khaw Boon Wan doesn’t geddit!

The media says that Mr Khaw Boon Wan told a Our Singapore Conversation group that there is “something wrong somewhere” with the Executive Condominium (EC) scheme and the scheme cannot carry on in its current form.

Here is the link to the Straits Times version of this confession and the brick bats thrown at him for his belated Eureka moment!

I could have told him so — and did — in January when I wrote a post extensively on the G’s Medusa-like HDB policies. Here is the link and the screen shot.

not just EC policy, Mr Khaw :(

not just EC policy, Mr Khaw :(

I believe the most important and urgent U-turn is for G to stop continuing to promise all future Singaporeans a HDB home. The first, second and 3rd generations of Singaporeans born and bred have already had their first and in some cases second and third — and for all we know even fourth!! — bites.

Let fourth and future generations either inherit, rent or work and save up to buy from the market, whether HDB resale or private.

Otherwise G may be doing to future generations what Singapore used to laugh at — the welfare state of our ex-colonial masters which ultimately took the Great out of Britain!

We — at least I — don’t want the PAP’s 80% public housing policy to be the Archilles heel that takes the zing out of Singapore :roll: :cry: